Kamloops pesticide debate put off until July

KAMLOOPS – A motion to prohibit cosmetic pesticides drew a large crowd to council chambers this week, but council was not quite ready to have the discussion many residents seemed more than ready to start.

Residents packed council chambers yesterday, Tuesday, June 2, to voice their opinions regarding Coun. Tina Lange’s motion to further prohibit pesticides for residential use. 

Lange hopes to change what is currently permitted when it comes to pesticide use. The bylaw currently allows for persons with recognized credentials to apply pesticides on residential property for cosmetic purposes but Lange's motion, if passed, will not allow for this. 

Mayor Peter Milobar had to remind speakers to keep public enquiries civil, and that the 'podium is not a pulpit' and is for questions to council only. After multiple speakers, but  before everyone had spoken, Milobar put a stop to the public enquiry portion of the meeting. 

Lange is not surprised by the passionate response to her motion and says she received many phone calls and emails before the meeting, both for and against her motion.

A pesticide bylaw was top of the Urban Agriculture committee’s list of immediate actions. Lange, who sits on the committee, brought it forward as a stand-alone motion because it is easier to discuss on its own rather than as part of the entire urban agriculture and food plan.

“I see the people who (spray pesticides) for the professional companies, they’re not wearing hazmat suits, they’re not wearing masks,” she says, adding she believes professionals use a much more liberal technique of stronger solution to spray weeds than most homeowners do.

Corey Munegatto of Pronto Enterprises believes a lot of homeowners don't know how to use pesticides safely but says certified applicators do. He believes the bylaw is a bit of a nonstarter and is not enforceable.

“Anyone can go to the store and pick (pesticides) up as long as they’re not caught… the city does not have the staff, or bylaw officers, to go all over town an enforce this,” Munegatto says.

Jacquie Doherty, of Grassroots Choice Lawn Care, agrees with tabling the motion so more discussion on the issue can be had.

“Is this a debate on science or a debate of politics?” she asks. 

Coun. Arjun Singh asked to table the motion for six weeks so council can gather more information and public input, and in the end the motion was tabled until July 14.

To contact a reporter for this story, email Dana Reynolds at dreynolds@infonews.ca or call 250-819-6089. To contact an editor, email mjones@infonews.ca or call 250-718-2724.

Join the Conversation!

Want to share your thoughts, add context, or connect with others in your community? Create a free account to comment on stories, ask questions, and join meaningful discussions on our new site.

One response

  1. NORAHG RESPONDS AGAINST KAMLOOPS, BRITISH COLUMBIA?NO ONE WANTS THIS #@!% BAN NONSENSE!The pesticide-hating councilor Tina Lange is WRONG about her proposal to recklessly and arbitrarily prohibit against conventional pest control products in Kamloops, British Columbia!No one wants this #@!% ban nonsense!In jurisdictions outside of Kamloops, anti-pesticide prohibition has already inflicted catastrophic carnage for businesses operating in the professional lawn care industry.Because of prohibition, an overwhelming number of these businesses disappear into oblivion within 2 or 3 years after prohibition.Because of prohibition, vast numbers of workers in the professional lawn care industry become unemployed.http://wp.me/P1jq40-43BBecause of prohibition, neighborhoods are ruined by pests, and green spaces become dangerous and pest-infested garbage dumps.http://wp.me/P1jq40-44ghttp://wp.me/P1jq40-4z3Dandelions become the dominant ground cover.So-called green alternative pesticides are stunningly expensive and simply do not work.http://wp.me/P1jq40-445Besides, any prohibition is a farce since residents can obtain conventional products either from other provinces, or from across the border in the United States, or through the Internet.http://wp.me/p1jq40-4mSIf city of Kamloops decides to impose prohibition, then residents and municipal officials had better get used to crawling on their hand and knees like cotton-pickers for weed-picking and insect-removal.No one wants this #@!% nonsense of manual weed picking just because there is an arbitrary prohibition!If a small minority of highly-motivated residents want to spend 40 to 50 hours and more per week of manual weed picking, that’s their prerogative.Moreover, manual weed picking is totally ineffective.http://wp.me/p1jq40-4mlImposing the life-style choice of manual weed picking on everyone else is WRONG!No one wants this cotton-picking nonsense in Kamloops!The pesticide-hating Tina Lange is WRONG!No one wants this #@!% ban nonsense in Kamloops!For more information regarding PROHIBITION INFLICTING CATASTROPHIC CARNAGE, go to…http://wp.me/P1jq40-26PWe are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that conspire to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAH G ).As a non-profit and independent organization, we are environmentalists who are dedicated to reporting about NON-EXPERT PESTICIDE-HATING FANATICS, as well as the work of RESPECTED and HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS.http://wp.me/p1jq40-8DVGet the latest details athttp://pesticidetruths.com/WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G.

Leave a Reply

Dana Reynolds

Dana Reynolds is originally from Saskatchewan, but previous to Kamloops lived in Toronto for five years. She is well educated, obtaining her Masters of Arts from York University and Certificate of Broadcast Journalism from Seneca College. Dana has a passion for travel, having worked and studied in three foreign countries. She is a political junkie, especially as pertains the Middle East as she wrote her thesis on Muslim immigration into Europe. Dana is very excited to be in Kamloops and embark on a career in journalism with Info News.

More Articles