Elevate your local knowledge
Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today!
Sign up for the iNFOnews newsletter today!
Selecting your primary region ensures you get the stories that matter to you first.
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a Louisiana inmate’s appeal that his death sentence was unconstitutional.
The appeal from death row inmate Lamondre Tucker was the latest to challenge capital punishment as unconstitutional after Justice Stephen Breyer issued a dissent last year calling for a re-evaluation of the death penalty.
Breyer had criticized the process as arbitrary, prone to mistakes and time-consuming. He dissented again Tuesday, noting that Tucker was sentenced to death in Caddo Parish, which imposes half the death sentences in the state even though it has only 5 per cent of the state’s population and just 5 per cent of its homicides.
“One could reasonably believe that if Tucker had committed the same crime but been tried and sentenced just across the Red River in, say, Bossier Parish, he would not now be on death row,” Breyer said.
He again urged the court to decide whether the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment banned by the Constitution. Breyer’s dissent was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld Tucker’s conviction for killing his pregnant girlfriend after she told him she believed he was her baby’s father.
Jurors sentenced then 18-year-old Tucker to death after convicting him of killing Tavia Sills in September 2009.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Want to share your thoughts, add context, or connect with others in your community?
You must be logged in to post a comment.