KXL critic in Obama administration speaks up: EPA questions growth of oilsands
WASHINGTON – A critic of the Keystone XL pipeline within the Obama administration has weighed in, as colleagues complete a long-awaited review of the project.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is challenging the basic logic cited by project supporters, which includes the Canadian government and the oil industry.
A pillar of the argument for this project is that Canada’s oil industry will continue growing anyway — so it might as well use pipelines, which are a cleaner transport method than trains.
But the EPA says falling oil prices mean it’s important to reconsider that assumption about growth of Canada’s oilsands.
In a letter to the State Department, which is leading the pipeline review, the environmental agency says its colleagues should give more weight to a long-term, low-oil-price scenario. It compares the carbon emissions from the pipeline to 5.7 million new passenger vehicles on the road.
The State Department is finishing its long-awaited, oft-delayed review and could make a recommendation within weeks to President Barack Obama.
Join the Conversation!
Want to share your thoughts, add context, or connect with others in your community?
You must be logged in to post a comment.


















